As an experiment to investigate AI platforms I asked Grok, ChatGPT and DeepSeek to write a 250 word essay about “why Americans allow Israel to kill and displace Palestinians.” The reason I focused the question on Americans, is simply because they are without doubt, Israel’s closest ally and the most able to wield political or financial influence on them. What was most interesting to me, was how matter of fact the process was. Not one of the platforms balked at the task or suggested in any way that this was a loaded question. All three refer to the role of the Israeli lobby and a failure of mass media. They all gave me the essay in a matter of seconds to minutes. Here are the results completely unedited and without further comment…

Grok

The complex relationship between the United States and Israel, rooted in historical, political, and cultural factors, shapes American policy and public opinion on Israel’s actions toward Palestinians. Several reasons explain why many Americans tolerate or overlook Israel’s policies, including the killing and displacement of Palestinians.

First, strategic interests drive U.S. support. Israel is a key ally in the Middle East, providing military and intelligence cooperation. The U.S. views Israel as a counterbalance to adversarial regimes, securing geopolitical influence. This alliance, solidified through decades of aid and agreements, often prioritizes Israel’s security over Palestinian rights in American foreign policy.

Second, domestic political dynamics play a significant role. The pro-Israel lobby, notably AIPAC, wields substantial influence, funding campaigns and shaping congressional narratives. Politicians face pressure to support Israel unequivocally, framing criticism as politically risky. This stifles debate, marginalizing Palestinian perspectives.

Third, cultural and religious ties bolster sympathy for Israel. Many Americans, particularly evangelical Christians, view Israel as a biblical homeland, aligning with its cause. Media portrayals often emphasize Israel’s narrative, depicting it as a democratic underdog facing existential threats, while Palestinian suffering receives less attention.

Finally, public apathy and misinformation contribute. Complex historical nuances, like the Nakba or occupation, are poorly understood, and U.S. audiences, distant from the conflict, prioritize domestic issues. This allows Israel’s actions—displacement through settlements or military operations—to persist with minimal American outcry.

While growing activism, especially among younger generations, challenges this status quo, entrenched interests and narratives continue to shield Israel from accountability in American eyes.

ChatGPT

The United States’ unwavering support for Israel, despite international outcry over the treatment of Palestinians, stems from a combination of historical, political, strategic, and cultural factors. At the heart of this relationship is a deep-rooted political alliance. Since the mid-20th century, Israel has been seen as a crucial ally in the Middle East, serving U.S. geopolitical interests in a region marked by instability and competition over oil and influence.

American domestic politics also play a significant role. Pro-Israel lobbying groups, most notably AIPAC, wield significant influence in Washington. Many politicians fear political consequences if they appear unsupportive of Israel, and bipartisan support in Congress has remained strong for decades.

Cultural and religious narratives further reinforce this alliance. Evangelical Christian support for Israel, rooted in biblical interpretations, adds a layer of moral justification for U.S. backing. Additionally, the portrayal of Israel in American media often emphasizes its right to self-defense while marginalizing Palestinian perspectives, shaping public opinion in favor of Israeli actions.

Lastly, many Americans may simply be unaware of the full scope of the humanitarian crisis in Palestine. A lack of nuanced coverage, combined with entrenched political narratives, leads to a perception that Israeli actions are necessary security measures rather than human rights violations.

In sum, a combination of strategic interests, domestic politics, cultural narratives, and media framing contributes to why many Americans tolerate or support Israeli policies that result in the displacement and death of Palestinians.

DeepSeek

The United States has long supported Israel militarily, politically, and financially, despite its ongoing occupation and violence against Palestinians. This support stems from several factors, including strategic alliances, lobbying influence, and ideological justifications.

First, Israel is seen as a key ally in a volatile region, serving U.S. geopolitical interests. American policymakers view Israel as a stable democracy (despite its discriminatory policies) and a counterbalance to adversaries like Iran. Military cooperation and intelligence sharing further entrench this relationship.

Second, pro-Israel lobbying groups, such as AIPAC (American Israel Public Affairs Committee), exert significant influence over U.S. politicians. Campaign donations and political pressure discourage criticism of Israel, framing its actions as self-defense rather than oppression. Meanwhile, Palestinian voices are often marginalized in U.S. media and politics.

Third, widespread propaganda portrays Palestinians as terrorists, dehumanizing them and justifying violence against them. Many Americans, influenced by biased media coverage, accept Israel’s narrative without questioning its systemic violence, illegal settlements, and apartheid policies.

Finally, religious and ideological beliefs play a role. Evangelical Christians support Israel for theological reasons, while others blindly equate anti-Zionism with antisemitism, stifling dissent.

Ultimately, U.S. support for Israel reflects power dynamics—prioritizing strategic interests over human rights. Until Americans challenge these narratives and demand accountability, U.S. policies will continue enabling Palestinian suffering.